서브메뉴
검색
상세정보
A unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese- [electronic resource]
![A unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese - [electronic resource] / Nurhayani...](/Sponge/Images/bookDefaults/DDbookdefaultsmall.png)
A unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문(국외)
- 자관 청구기호
- 기본표목-개인명
- 표제와 책임표시사항
- A unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese - [electronic resource] / Nurhayani, Ika.
- 발행, 배포, 간사 사항
- 발행, 배포, 간사 사항
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(233 p)
- 일반주기
- Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
- 일반주기
- Adviser: John Bowers.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2014.
- 이용제한주기
- This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
- 요약 등 주기
- 요약This dissertation proposes a unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese which includes applicative, passive and adversative passive. The three valence-changing processes have been commonly analyzed as separate phenomena in the previous frameworks. The dissertation shows that independent analyses on the syntax of valence by Baker (1988), Marantz (1993), and Pylkkanen (2002) on applicative, Kratzer (1996) and Collins (2005) on passive, and Kubo (1992) and Pylkkanen (2000) on adversative passive are problematic for Javanese. First, the frameworks cannot provide sufficient argument heads for all of the three functions of suffix -ake: benefactive, instrumental, and theme. Second, they cannot explain the three positions of the passive agent: preverbal, postverbal and in a PP at the end of sentence. Third, they cannot explain the fact that Javanese adversative passive has no possessor raising construction.
- 요약 등 주기
- 요약I propose that the problems can be solved with a unified account of the syntax of valence of Javanese. This is done by incorporating the frameworks of Bowers (2010) on applicative and passive, Merchant (2013) on passive, and Aldridge (2011) on ergativity. Based on Bowers (2010), the three functions of suffix -ake can be accommodated at separate argument heads. Moreover, based on the same framework, the agent can be originated at the agent head at the bottom of the derivation, and then raised to the preverbal and the postverbal positions due to the ergative features at the positions. Lastly, the adversative passive is defined as a combination of passivization with a specific adversative passive ke- merged at the Spec of Voice and the applicative suffix -an merged at the Affectee head.
- 주제명부출표목-일반주제명
- 부출표목-단체명
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstracts International. 75-06A(E).
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 원문정보보기
- 소장사항
-
20180515 2018
MARC
008180601s2014 us esm 001c eng■001MOKWON01257705
■00520180518094437
■007cr
■020 ▼a9781303749452
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI3579132
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■090 ▼a전자도서(박사논문)
■1001 ▼aNurhayani, Ika.
■24512▼aA unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese▼h[electronic resource]▼cNurhayani, Ika.
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bCornell University▼c2014
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2014
■300 ▼a1 online resource(233 p)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdviser: John Bowers.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2014.
■506 ▼aThis item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
■520 ▼aThis dissertation proposes a unified account of the syntax of valence in Javanese which includes applicative, passive and adversative passive. The three valence-changing processes have been commonly analyzed as separate phenomena in the previous frameworks. The dissertation shows that independent analyses on the syntax of valence by Baker (1988), Marantz (1993), and Pylkkanen (2002) on applicative, Kratzer (1996) and Collins (2005) on passive, and Kubo (1992) and Pylkkanen (2000) on adversative passive are problematic for Javanese. First, the frameworks cannot provide sufficient argument heads for all of the three functions of suffix -ake: benefactive, instrumental, and theme. Second, they cannot explain the three positions of the passive agent: preverbal, postverbal and in a PP at the end of sentence. Third, they cannot explain the fact that Javanese adversative passive has no possessor raising construction.
■520 ▼aI propose that the problems can be solved with a unified account of the syntax of valence of Javanese. This is done by incorporating the frameworks of Bowers (2010) on applicative and passive, Merchant (2013) on passive, and Aldridge (2011) on ergativity. Based on Bowers (2010), the three functions of suffix -ake can be accommodated at separate argument heads. Moreover, based on the same framework, the agent can be originated at the agent head at the bottom of the derivation, and then raised to the preverbal and the postverbal positions due to the ergative features at the positions. Lastly, the adversative passive is defined as a combination of passivization with a specific adversative passive ke- merged at the Spec of Voice and the applicative suffix -an merged at the Affectee head.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0058.
■650 4▼aLinguistics
■690 ▼a0290
■71020▼aCornell University.
■7730 ▼tDissertation Abstracts International▼g75-06A(E).
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0058
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2014
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14824007▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a20180515▼f2018
