서브메뉴
검색
상세정보
The Evaluation of Various Antibiotic Alternatives for Optimum Poultry Performance Under Pathogen Challenge- [electronic resource]
The Evaluation of Various Antibiotic Alternatives for Optimum Poultry Performance Under Pathogen Challenge- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문(국외)
- 자관 청구기호
- 기본표목-개인명
- 표제와 책임표시사항
- The Evaluation of Various Antibiotic Alternatives for Optimum Poultry Performance Under Pathogen Challenge - [electronic resource] / Yansoon Moneer Farhan Al-Jumaa
- 발행, 배포, 간사 사항
- 발행, 배포, 간사 사항
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(p.152 )
- 일반주기
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
- 일반주기
- Advisor: Bailey, Christopher A.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2022.
- 이용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 요약 등 주기
- 요약This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of different types of feed additives (probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and their mixtures) on challenged or Noneee-challenged broilers with Clostridium perfringens or Salmonella Typhimurium, in starter or full-term chickens' performance.In the first study, the objective was to determine the effect of adding postbiotics (XPC® and XPC-Ultra®) and prebiotics (Safmannan® 125 and Safmannan® 250) to broiler chickens' performance while challenging with Salmonella Typhimurium. The results of this study did not show significant enhancement in broilers' performance at day 10. Safmannan® 125 showed significant reduction in Salmonella Typhimurium count on the plates compared to all other challenged groups.In the second study, postbiotics (XPC® and XPC-Ultra®) and prebiotics (Safmannan® 250 and Safmannan® 500) were used to study their effects on broiler chickens' performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed these additives groups did not retain the performances parameters to Noneee-challenged control-like at day 21, as they did not enhance performance significantly compared to challenged control group with no additives.In the third study, the objective was to evaluate the effect of adding Phelio Microsaf® probiotic, Envera Goplus® probiotic, Safmannan® prebiotic, and combination of Envera Goplus® + Safmannan® on broiler performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed no significant differences in performance parameters between the additives groups and challenged control group at day 21 while challenging with Clostridium perfringens.In the fourth study, the objective was to evaluate the effect Envera Goplus® probiotic, Actisaf® probiotic, Safmannan® prebiotic, and XPC® postbiotic on full term broiler chickens' performance, fecal dry matter percentage, and intestinal morphology of the chickens. The results showed there were no significant enhancement of full term broilers' performance at day 42 and no differences in fecal dry matter percentage or intestinal morphology between groups were found.In the final study, the objective was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of Safmannan® prebiotic + Bacillus probiotic on broilers' performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed no significant enhancement in broilers' performance while adding the combinations of Safmannan® and Bacillus.In conclusion, adding the mentioned additives in these concentrations did not enhance broilers' performance while challenging with or without pathogens.
- 주제명부출표목-일반주제명
- 주제명부출표목-일반주제명
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 비통제 색인어
- 부출표목-단체명
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-03A.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 원문정보보기
- 소장사항
-
202402 2024
MARC
008240306s2022 s | s 0000c| eng d■001000016935511
■00520240214101941
■006m o d
■007cr
■020 ▼a9798380360579
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30746333
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)0803vireo27174Al-Jumaa
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■08204▼a636
■090 ▼a전자도서(박사논문)
■1001 ▼aAl-Jumaa, Yansoon Moneer Farhan.
■24510▼aThe Evaluation of Various Antibiotic Alternatives for Optimum Poultry Performance Under Pathogen Challenge▼h[electronic resource]▼cYansoon Moneer Farhan Al-Jumaa
■260 ▼a[S.l.]▼bTexas A&M University. ▼c2022
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2022
■300 ▼a1 online resource(p.152 )
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Bailey, Christopher A.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2022.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aThis research was conducted to evaluate the effect of different types of feed additives (probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics and their mixtures) on challenged or Noneee-challenged broilers with Clostridium perfringens or Salmonella Typhimurium, in starter or full-term chickens' performance.In the first study, the objective was to determine the effect of adding postbiotics (XPC® and XPC-Ultra®) and prebiotics (Safmannan® 125 and Safmannan® 250) to broiler chickens' performance while challenging with Salmonella Typhimurium. The results of this study did not show significant enhancement in broilers' performance at day 10. Safmannan® 125 showed significant reduction in Salmonella Typhimurium count on the plates compared to all other challenged groups.In the second study, postbiotics (XPC® and XPC-Ultra®) and prebiotics (Safmannan® 250 and Safmannan® 500) were used to study their effects on broiler chickens' performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed these additives groups did not retain the performances parameters to Noneee-challenged control-like at day 21, as they did not enhance performance significantly compared to challenged control group with no additives.In the third study, the objective was to evaluate the effect of adding Phelio Microsaf® probiotic, Envera Goplus® probiotic, Safmannan® prebiotic, and combination of Envera Goplus® + Safmannan® on broiler performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed no significant differences in performance parameters between the additives groups and challenged control group at day 21 while challenging with Clostridium perfringens.In the fourth study, the objective was to evaluate the effect Envera Goplus® probiotic, Actisaf® probiotic, Safmannan® prebiotic, and XPC® postbiotic on full term broiler chickens' performance, fecal dry matter percentage, and intestinal morphology of the chickens. The results showed there were no significant enhancement of full term broilers' performance at day 42 and no differences in fecal dry matter percentage or intestinal morphology between groups were found.In the final study, the objective was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of Safmannan® prebiotic + Bacillus probiotic on broilers' performance while challenging with Clostridium perfringens. The results showed no significant enhancement in broilers' performance while adding the combinations of Safmannan® and Bacillus.In conclusion, adding the mentioned additives in these concentrations did not enhance broilers' performance while challenging with or without pathogens.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0803.
■650 4▼aAnimal sciences.
■650 4▼aEnvironmental science.
■653 ▼aBroilers
■653 ▼aAntibiotic alternatives
■653 ▼aProbiotic
■653 ▼aPrebiotic
■653 ▼aPostbiotic
■653 ▼aYeast cell wall
■653 ▼aBacillus
■653 ▼aLactobacillus
■653 ▼aSalmonella Typhimurium
■653 ▼aClostridium perfringens
■690 ▼a0475
■690 ▼a0503
■690 ▼a0768
■71020▼aTexas A&M University▼bPoultry Science.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-03A.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0803
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2022
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16935511▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
