서브메뉴
검색
상세정보
Excavating Diotima: Rehistoricizing Pre-Aristotelian Classical Rhetoric. Welch, Kathleen Ethel [microform]
Excavating Diotima: Rehistoricizing Pre-Aristotelian Classical Rhetoric. Welch, Kathleen Ethel [microform]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 마이크로피시
- 언어부호
- 본문언어 - English(U.S.; OklahomaED35
- 청구기호
- 서명/저자
- Excavating Diotima: Rehistoricizing Pre-Aristotelian Classical Rhetoric. : Welch, Kathleen Ethel - [microform]
- 발행사항
- 형태사항
- 14; 1
- 총서명
- ERIC Reports
- 주기사항
- 14p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (78th, Chicago, IL, October 29-November 1, 1992).
- 초록/해제
- 요약Because canon formation directly influences curriculum construction, classical Greek rhetorical studies must make an assessment of how womens presence in these historical discourses has been at best marginalized, at worst erased. The structural oppression of women as a class and the institution of slavery need to be included in school curricula as standard issues. Representations of Diotima, Socrates teacher, as a mythical figure constitute a case in point. Mary Ellen Waithes work on Diotima argues that Diotima is an historical person and thus counters standard scholarship which excludes women thinkers from the canon of philosophical discourse. Both Waithes article and Platos Symposium should be included in classical rhetoric seminars in a way that places Diotima on the same plane as Socrates. Reader response theory, which posits that the act of understanding meaning in texts is affected by the predisposition of the reading mind, supports this demand for a revision of curricula. The erasure, marginalization, and ridiculing of a figure such as Diotima can be seen as a historical disempowerment of women as readers, writers, and speakers. Training in the history and production of discourse must explore the relationship between language and power in a way that allows women students to see themselves in the texts they study. (Contains 16 references.) (SAM)
- 복제주기
- Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
- 일반주제명
- 키워드
- 기타저자
MARC
008980918s1992 us b 000 0 eng d■0010000409922
■001PCUL00337190
■002ED354567
■00520020731050927
■007heuumu---buua
■008980918s1992 us b 000 0 eng d
■040 ▼apcul
■0410 ▼aEnglish(U.S.; OklahomaED35
■090 ▼a370.78▼bE68
■24500▼aExcavating Diotima: Rehistoricizing Pre-Aristotelian Classical Rhetoric.▼cWelch, Kathleen Ethel▼h[microform]
■260 ▼cOct 92
■300 ▼a14; 1
■440 0▼aERIC Reports
■500 ▼a14p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (78th, Chicago, IL, October 29-November 1, 1992).
■520 ▼aBecause canon formation directly influences curriculum construction, classical Greek rhetorical studies must make an assessment of how womens presence in these historical discourses has been at best marginalized, at worst erased. The structural oppression of women as a class and the institution of slavery need to be included in school curricula as standard issues. Representations of Diotima, Socrates teacher, as a mythical figure constitute a case in point. Mary Ellen Waithes work on Diotima argues that Diotima is an historical person and thus counters standard scholarship which excludes women thinkers from the canon of philosophical discourse. Both Waithes article and Platos Symposium should be included in classical rhetoric seminars in a way that places Diotima on the same plane as Socrates. Reader response theory, which posits that the act of understanding meaning in texts is affected by the predisposition of the reading mind, supports this demand for a revision of curricula. The erasure, marginalization, and ridiculing of a figure such as Diotima can be seen as a historical disempowerment of women as readers, writers, and speakers. Training in the history and production of discourse must explore the relationship between language and power in a way that allows women students to see themselves in the texts they study. (Contains 16 references.) (SAM)
■533 ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield, VA▼cERIC Document Reproduction Service.▼emicrofiches ; 11×15 cm.
■650 4▼xEducation
■653 ▼aCollege Curriculum▼aHigher Education▼aPhilosophy▼aReader Response▼aRhetorical Criticism▼aSex Bias▼aClassical Rhetoric▼aCurriculum Emphases▼aDiotima▼aInterpretive Communities▼aPlato▼aRhetorical Strategies▼aSocrates
■7001 ▼aWelch, Kathleen Ethel
■999 ▼a150; 070; 120
한글
ENG
日本
中文
Việt Nam