서브메뉴
검색
상세정보
National Testing and Assessment Strategies: Equity Implications of Leading Proposals for National Examinations. Outline of Remarks at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment. Elliott, Emerson J [microform]
National Testing and Assessment Strategies: Equity Implications of Leading Proposals for National Examinations. Outline of Remarks at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment. Elliott, Emerson J [microform]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 마이크로피시
- 언어부호
- 본문언어 - English
- 청구기호
- 서명/저자
- National Testing and Assessment Strategies: Equity Implications of Leading Proposals for National Examinations. Outline of Remarks at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment. : Elliott, Emerson J - [microform]
- 발행사항
- 형태사항
- 7; 1
- 총서명
- ERIC Reports
- 주기사항
- 7p.
- 초록/해제
- 요약An outline of remarks made at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment in March of 1993 is provided. Issues of equity in education and educational assessment are discussed in the context of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The NAEP is a national test in the sense that it monitors what is happening in the nation, but it is not a national examination for individual students in the sense that the term has been used in recent discussions. There continues to be considerable debate about the proper role for the NAEP. The National Council on Education Standards and Testing has suggested that the present NAEP functions well as a measurement of and report on trends, and should be kept separate from a new national system of examinations. The NAEP has been sensitive to equity issues and eliminating bias in assessment. As the NAEP moves into the area of performance assessment, new equity issues are emerging. Some recent examples of differences in performance by racial groups are highlighted. For the NAEP to be the diagnostic tool it is meant to be, the Federal Government needs to improve the capability of its assessment data, and educators must make sure that teachers and principals receive the training they need to use NAEP information effectively. (SLD)
- 복제주기
- Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
- 원본주기
- / UED
- 일반주제명
- 키워드
- 기타저자
MARC
008980919s1293 us b 000 0 eng d■0010000417000
■001PCUL00345470
■002ED361369
■00520020801202151
■007heuumu---buua
■008980919s1293 us b 000 0 eng d
■040 ▼apcul
■0410 ▼aEnglish
■090 ▼a370.78▼bE68
■24500▼aNational Testing and Assessment Strategies: Equity Implications of Leading Proposals for National Examinations. Outline of Remarks at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment.▼cElliott, Emerson J▼h[microform]
■260 ▼aU.S.; District of Columbia▼bNational Center for Education Statistics (ED), Washington, DC.▼c12 Mar 93
■300 ▼a7; 1
■440 0▼aERIC Reports
■500 ▼a7p.
■520 ▼aAn outline of remarks made at a National Seminar on Equity and Educational Testing and Assessment in March of 1993 is provided. Issues of equity in education and educational assessment are discussed in the context of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The NAEP is a national test in the sense that it monitors what is happening in the nation, but it is not a national examination for individual students in the sense that the term has been used in recent discussions. There continues to be considerable debate about the proper role for the NAEP. The National Council on Education Standards and Testing has suggested that the present NAEP functions well as a measurement of and report on trends, and should be kept separate from a new national system of examinations. The NAEP has been sensitive to equity issues and eliminating bias in assessment. As the NAEP moves into the area of performance assessment, new equity issues are emerging. Some recent examples of differences in performance by racial groups are highlighted. For the NAEP to be the diagnostic tool it is meant to be, the Federal Government needs to improve the capability of its assessment data, and educators must make sure that teachers and principals receive the training they need to use NAEP information effectively. (SLD)
■533 ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield, VA▼cERIC Document Reproduction Service.▼emicrofiches ; 11×15 cm.
■534 ▼aUED
■650 4▼xEducation
■653 ▼aEducational Assessment▼aEducational Trends▼aElementary Secondary Education▼aEqual Education▼aFederal Government▼aGovernment Role▼aNational Competency Tests▼aNational Programs▼aProfessional Development▼aRacial Differences▼aSeminars▼aStudent Evaluation▼aTest Bias▼aTesting Programs▼aTest Use▼aTraining▼aTrend Analysis▼aNational Assessment of Educational Progress▼aPerformance Based Evaluation
■7001 ▼aElliott, Emerson J.
■999 ▼a120; 142
