본문

서브메뉴

상세정보

Research and Reform: Stories of Structure, Strategy and Suspense. Elliott, Emerson J [microform]
Research and Reform: Stories of Structure, Strategy and Suspense. : Elliott, Emerson J - [...
Research and Reform: Stories of Structure, Strategy and Suspense. Elliott, Emerson J [microform]

상세정보

자료유형  
 마이크로피시
언어부호  
본문언어 - English
청구기호  
370.78 E68
    서명/저자  
    Research and Reform: Stories of Structure, Strategy and Suspense. : Elliott, Emerson J - [microform]
    발행사항  
    U.S.; District of Columbiamm : , Apr 94
      형태사항  
      20; 1
      총서명  
      ERIC Reports
      주기사항  
      20p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 4-8, 1994). Appendices contain smudged print and may not reproduce well.
      초록/해제  
      요약This paper offers examples of the ways in which research influences national policies related to assessment and program evaluation. It describes an ongoing evaluation being conducted by the National Academy of Education (NAE) of the Trial State Assessment, a piece of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). At this interim stage, the NAE study has been well received by Congress and other audiences because the NAE panel: (1) covered the topics requested by Congress; (2) did its homework; (3) comported itself impartially; (4) provided clearly written results; (5) observed Washington etiquette regarding submission; and (6) briefed Congress personally. Any external evaluation group must guarantee impartial research, overcome Congressional distrust of researchers, resist pressure from contending parties, move from broad legislative objectives to specific researchable problems, and specify deadlines and formats for clear reporting. A conclusion is that researchers can strongly influence national policy when they have evidence for their conclusions; their work deals with problems faced by policymakers; and they clearly state their conclusions. Appendices contain pertinent legislation from the General Education Provisions Act, a list of studies completed by the NAE evaluation panel, and topics of NAE researc
      복제주기  
      Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
      일반주제명  
      키워드  
      기타저자  

      MARC

       008980922s1994        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■0010000429185
      ■001PCUL00358333
      ■002ED373426
      ■00520020802184010
      ■007heuumu---buua
      ■008980922s1994        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■040    ▼apcul
      ■0410  ▼aEnglish
      ■090    ▼a370.78▼bE68
      ■24500▼aResearch  and  Reform:  Stories  of  Structure,  Strategy  and  Suspense.▼cElliott,  Emerson  J▼h[microform]
      ■260    ▼aU.S.;  District  of  Columbiamm▼cApr  94
      ■300    ▼a20;  1
      ■440  0▼aERIC  Reports
      ■500    ▼a20p.;  Paper  presented  at  the  Annual  Meeting  of  the  American  Educational  Research  Association  (New  Orleans,  LA,  April  4-8,  1994).  Appendices  contain  smudged  print  and  may  not  reproduce  well.
      ■520    ▼aThis  paper  offers  examples  of  the  ways  in  which  research  influences  national  policies  related  to  assessment  and  program  evaluation.  It  describes  an  ongoing  evaluation  being  conducted  by  the  National  Academy  of  Education  (NAE)  of  the  Trial  State  Assessment,  a  piece  of  the  National  Assessment  of  Educational  Progress  (NAEP).  At  this  interim  stage,  the  NAE  study  has  been  well  received  by  Congress  and  other  audiences  because  the  NAE  panel:  (1)  covered  the  topics  requested  by  Congress;  (2)  did  its  homework;  (3)  comported  itself  impartially;  (4)  provided  clearly  written  results;  (5)  observed  Washington  etiquette  regarding  submission;  and  (6)  briefed  Congress  personally.  Any  external  evaluation  group  must  guarantee  impartial  research,  overcome  Congressional  distrust  of  researchers,  resist  pressure  from  contending  parties,  move  from  broad  legislative  objectives  to  specific  researchable  problems,  and  specify  deadlines  and  formats  for  clear  reporting.  A  conclusion  is  that  researchers  can  strongly  influence  national  policy  when  they  have  evidence  for  their  conclusions;  their  work  deals  with  problems  faced  by  policymakers;  and  they  clearly  state  their  conclusions.  Appendices  contain  pertinent  legislation  from  the  General  Education  Provisions  Act,  a  list  of  studies  completed  by  the  NAE  evaluation  panel,  and  topics  of  NAE  researc
      ■533    ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield,  VA▼cERIC  Document  Reproduction  Service.▼emicrofiches  ;  11×15  cm.
      ■650  4▼xEducation
      ■653    ▼aBlue  Ribbon  Commissions▼aEducational  Assessment▼aEducational  Policy▼aEducational  Research▼aElementary  Secondary  Education▼aFederal  Programs▼aPolicy  Formation▼aProgram  Evaluation▼aResearch  Committees▼aTheory  Practice  Relationship
      ■7001  ▼aElliott,  Emerson  J.
      ■999    ▼a150;  120

      미리보기

      내보내기

      chatGPT토론

      Ai 추천 관련 도서


        신착도서 더보기
        관련도서 더보기
        최근 3년간 통계입니다.
        SMS 발송 간략정보 이동 상세정보출력

        소장정보

        • 예약
        • 서가에 없는 책 신고
        • 자료배달서비스
        • 나의폴더
        • 우선정리요청
        소장자료
        등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
        MI103318 MF  370.78 E68 참고자료실(2층) 대출불가 대출불가
        마이폴더

        * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

        해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

        관련도서

        관련 인기도서

        서평쓰기

        도서위치

        AiBot !!
        CH