본문

서브메뉴

상세정보

A Comprehensive System of Community Colleges in Ohio: To Be or Not To Be? : Sanders, Elena Y- [microform]
A Comprehensive System of Community Colleges in Ohio: To Be or Not To Be? : Sanders, Elena...
A Comprehensive System of Community Colleges in Ohio: To Be or Not To Be? : Sanders, Elena Y- [microform]

상세정보

자료유형  
 마이크로피시
언어부호  
본문언어 - English
청구기호  
370.78 E68
    서명/저자  
    A Comprehensive System of Community Colleges in Ohio: To Be or Not To Be? : Sanders, Elena Y - [microform]
    발행사항  
    U.S.; Ohio : , 22 Apr 95(
      형태사항  
      23; 1
      총서명  
      ERIC Reports
      주기사항  
      23p.; Paper presented at the Annual Graduate Student Seminar of the Council of Universities and Colleges (Minneapolis, MN, April 22, 1995).
      초록/해제  
      요약After 40 years of efforts, the first bill authorizing the establishment of community colleges in the state of Ohio was finally adopted in June 1961. Before and after the passage of the act, attempts had been made to create a comprehensive community college system in Ohio, but all of them failed. A 1970 study by the Ohio Board of Regents (OBOR), for example, found that a lack of coordination among universities, technical schools, and community colleges led to a duplication of efforts and recommended the creation of comprehensive community colleges to better serve their communities. Public and private four-year universities, however, were against the recommendation fearing negative effects on enrollments. In 1992, a task force was created to suggest ways to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the states public higher education system, recommending restructuring the two-year campuses and again advocating a comprehensive community college system. The task force also found that the public were often confused about the services available at community colleges. In response, while not establishing comprehensive systems, the OBOR established service expectations for all two-year colleges and regional campuses. While these expectations represent a possible starting point, attempts to create a comprehensive community college system in Ohio have so far failed because of political pressure from influential interest groups, including private colleges, proponents of vocational and technical education, and state four-year universitie
      복제주기  
      Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
      일반주제명  
      키워드  
      기타저자  

      MARC

       008980930s2295        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■0010000443259
      ■001PCUL00377453
      ■002ED391549
      ■00520020803095852
      ■007heuumu---buua
      ■008980930s2295        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■040    ▼apcul
      ■0410  ▼aEnglish
      ■090    ▼a370.78▼bE68
      ■24502▼aA  Comprehensive  System  of  Community  Colleges  in  Ohio:  To  Be  or  Not  To  Be?▼cSanders,  Elena  Y▼h[microform]
      ■260    ▼aU.S.;  Ohio▼c22  Apr  95(
      ■300    ▼a23;  1
      ■440  0▼aERIC  Reports
      ■500    ▼a23p.;  Paper  presented  at  the  Annual  Graduate  Student  Seminar  of  the  Council  of  Universities  and  Colleges  (Minneapolis,  MN,  April  22,  1995).
      ■520    ▼aAfter  40  years  of  efforts,  the  first  bill  authorizing  the  establishment  of  community  colleges  in  the  state  of  Ohio  was  finally  adopted  in  June  1961.  Before  and  after  the  passage  of  the  act,  attempts  had  been  made  to  create  a  comprehensive  community  college  system  in  Ohio,  but  all  of  them  failed.  A  1970  study  by  the  Ohio  Board  of  Regents  (OBOR),  for  example,  found  that  a  lack  of  coordination  among  universities,  technical  schools,  and  community  colleges  led  to  a  duplication  of  efforts  and  recommended  the  creation  of  comprehensive  community  colleges  to  better  serve  their  communities.  Public  and  private  four-year  universities,  however,  were  against  the  recommendation  fearing  negative  effects  on  enrollments.  In  1992,  a  task  force  was  created  to  suggest  ways  to  improve  the  effectiveness  and  efficiency  of  the  states  public  higher  education  system,  recommending  restructuring  the  two-year  campuses  and  again  advocating  a  comprehensive  community  college  system.  The  task  force  also  found  that  the  public  were  often  confused  about  the  services  available  at  community  colleges.  In  response,  while  not  establishing  comprehensive  systems,  the  OBOR  established  service  expectations  for  all  two-year  colleges  and  regional  campuses.  While  these  expectations  represent  a  possible  starting  point,  attempts  to  create  a  comprehensive  community  college  system  in  Ohio  have  so  far  failed  because  of  political  pressure  from  influential  interest  groups,  including  private  colleges,  proponents  of  vocational  and  technical  education,  and  state  four-year  universitie
      ■533    ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield,  VA▼cERIC  Document  Reproduction  Service.▼emicrofiches  ;  11×15  cm.
      ■650  4▼xEducation
      ■653    ▼aBoard  of  Education  Policy▼aCollege  Role▼aCommunity  Colleges▼aComprehensive  Programs▼aEducational  History▼aEducational  Legislation▼aGovernment  School  Relationship▼aHigher  Education▼aInstitutional  Mission▼aPolitics  of  Education▼aSchool  Community  Relationship▼aStatewide  Planning▼aTwo  Year  Colleges▼aUniversities▼aVocational  Education▼aOhio
      ■7001  ▼aSanders,  Elena  Y.
      ■999    ▼a120;  150

      미리보기

      내보내기

      chatGPT토론

      Ai 추천 관련 도서


        신착도서 더보기
        관련도서 더보기
        최근 3년간 통계입니다.
        SMS 발송 간략정보 이동 상세정보출력

        소장정보

        • 예약
        • 서가에 없는 책 신고
        • 자료배달서비스
        • 나의폴더
        • 우선정리요청
        소장자료
        등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
        MI117392 MF  370.78 E68 참고자료실(2층) 대출불가 대출불가
        마이폴더

        * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

        해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

        관련도서

        관련 인기도서

        서평쓰기

        도서위치

        AiBot !!
        CH