본문

서브메뉴

상세정보

Toward a Framework for Constructed-Response Items. Bennett, Randy Elliot, And Others [microform]
Toward a Framework for Constructed-Response Items. : Bennett, Randy Elliot,  And Others - ...
Toward a Framework for Constructed-Response Items. Bennett, Randy Elliot, And Others [microform]

상세정보

자료유형  
 마이크로피시
언어부호  
본문언어 - English
보고서번호  
ETS-RR-90-7
청구기호  
370.78 E68
    서명/저자  
    Toward a Framework for Constructed-Response Items. : Bennett, Randy Elliot, And Others - [microform]
    발행사항  
    U.S.; New Jersey : Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.D , Jun 90
      형태사항  
      66; 1
      총서명  
      ERIC Reports
      주기사항  
      66p.
      초록/해제  
      요약A framework for categorizing constructed-response items was developed in which items were ordered on a continuum from multiple-choice to presentationperformance according to the degree of constraint placed on the examinees response. Two investigations were carried out to evaluate the validity of this framework. In the first investigation, 27 test development staff assigned 46 items of various formats to the categories. Overall, agreement with the intended item categorizations was good, with a median of 2 of a possible 27 judges disagreeing with a given items classification. In the second investigation, responses of 40 examinees each to 4 sets of items were scored by test development staff, with each set scored by 4 individuals. Results showed scoring agreement to be highest for a category requiring the examinee to choose a response from an extended stimulus array and lowest for items requiring that the stimulus be reordered to form a correct sequence. Whether the reported agreement levels represent sufficient accuracy to permit the widespread use of such items in standardized tests depends on whether some degree of scoring error, however small, can be accepted. Appendix A gives sample items organized by category, and Appendix B is a scoring guide organized by item category. (Contains 1 figure, 7 tables, and 13 references.) (AuthorSLD)
      복제주기  
      Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
      일반주제명  
      키워드  
      기타저자  
      기타저자  

      MARC

       008980930s1990        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■0010000446672
      ■001PCUL00381193
      ■002ED395032
      ■00520020803201956
      ■007heuumu---buua
      ■008980930s1990        us            b          000  0  eng  d
      ■040    ▼apcul
      ■0410  ▼aEnglish
      ■088    ▼aETS-RR-90-7
      ■090    ▼a370.78▼bE68
      ■24500▼aToward  a  Framework  for  Constructed-Response  Items.▼cBennett,  Randy  Elliot,    And  Others▼h[microform]
      ■260    ▼aU.S.;  New  Jersey▼bEducational  Testing  Service,  Princeton,  N.J.D▼cJun  90
      ■300    ▼a66;  1
      ■440  0▼aERIC  Reports
      ■500    ▼a66p.
      ■520    ▼aA  framework  for  categorizing  constructed-response  items  was  developed  in  which  items  were  ordered  on  a  continuum  from  multiple-choice  to  presentationperformance  according  to  the  degree  of  constraint  placed  on  the  examinees  response.  Two  investigations  were  carried  out  to  evaluate  the  validity  of  this  framework.  In  the  first  investigation,  27  test  development  staff  assigned  46  items  of  various  formats  to  the  categories.  Overall,  agreement  with  the  intended  item  categorizations  was  good,  with  a  median  of  2  of  a  possible  27  judges  disagreeing  with  a  given  items  classification.  In  the  second  investigation,  responses  of  40  examinees  each  to  4  sets  of  items  were  scored  by  test  development  staff,  with  each  set  scored  by  4  individuals.  Results  showed  scoring  agreement  to  be  highest  for  a  category  requiring  the  examinee  to  choose  a  response  from  an  extended  stimulus  array  and  lowest  for  items  requiring  that  the  stimulus  be  reordered  to  form  a  correct  sequence.  Whether  the  reported  agreement  levels  represent  sufficient  accuracy  to  permit  the  widespread  use  of  such  items  in  standardized  tests  depends  on  whether  some  degree  of  scoring  error,  however  small,  can  be  accepted.  Appendix  A  gives  sample  items  organized  by  category,  and  Appendix  B  is  a  scoring  guide  organized  by  item  category.  (Contains  1  figure,  7  tables,  and  13  references.)  (AuthorSLD)
      ■533    ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield,  VA▼cERIC  Document  Reproduction  Service.▼emicrofiches  ;  11×15  cm.
      ■650  4▼xEducation
      ■653    ▼aClassification▼aConstructed  Response▼aModels▼aMultiple  Choice  Tests▼aPerformance  Based  Assessment▼aResponses▼aScoring▼aStandardized  Tests▼aTest  Construction▼aTest  Items▼aValidity
      ■7001  ▼aBennett,  Randy  Elliot
      ■7001  ▼aAnd  Others
      ■999    ▼a142

      미리보기

      내보내기

      chatGPT토론

      Ai 추천 관련 도서


        신착도서 더보기
        관련도서 더보기
        최근 3년간 통계입니다.
        SMS 발송 간략정보 이동 상세정보출력

        소장정보

        • 예약
        • 서가에 없는 책 신고
        • 자료배달서비스
        • 나의폴더
        • 우선정리요청
        소장자료
        등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
        MI120805 MF  370.78 E68 참고자료실(2층) 대출불가 대출불가
        마이폴더

        * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

        해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

        관련도서

        관련 인기도서

        서평쓰기

        도서위치

        AiBot !!
        CH