서브메뉴
검색
상세정보
Evaluating Deficiencies in Campus Facilities: The Institutional ResearchPhysical Plant Nexus. Casey, John M [microform]
Evaluating Deficiencies in Campus Facilities: The Institutional ResearchPhysical Plant Nexus. Casey, John M [microform]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 마이크로피시
- 언어부호
- 본문언어 - English
- 청구기호
- 서명/저자
- Evaluating Deficiencies in Campus Facilities: The Institutional ResearchPhysical Plant Nexus. : Casey, John M - [microform]
- 발행사항
- 형태사항
- 25; 1
- 총서명
- ERIC Reports
- 주기사항
- 25p.; Paper presented at the Meeting of the Southern Association for Institutional Research and the Society for College and University Planning (Fort Lauderdale, FL, October 11, 1990). For a related paper, see HE 028 004.
- 초록/해제
- 요약The University of Georgia (UG) conducted a complete campus building condition evaluation survey in 1989 that identified the nature and magnitude of the capital renewaldeferred maintenance requirements for each campus building. The survey design was based on a model developed by Harlan Bareither at the University of Illinois. Data were collected at weekly meetings held for 3 hours each over several months. The dollar value of all necessary capital renewal and deferred maintenance work was estimated on a building by building basis. The total analysis covered 1,118 buildings comprising over 11 million square feet. The estimate for each building was compared to the total replacement value of the building and the resultant percentage deficiency was recorded. Results found that: (1) roof and window replacements totaled almost 9 million; (2) new fixed equipment and elevators totaled over 6 million; (3) plumbing and fire protection waste piping and sprinkler systems totaled over 2 million; (4) replacement of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems equipment and controls accounted for almost 9 million; and (5) new distribution wiring and fire alarms were estimated at 2 million. The analysis also noted that under a formula funding system like the one UG uses, the total deficiency of almost 30 percent cannot be corrected with the planned yearly funding level of .75 percent of total replacement cost. (Contains 43 references.) (JB)
- 복제주기
- Microfiche. . Springfield, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service. . microfiches ; 11×15 cm.
- 일반주제명
- 키워드
- 기타저자
MARC
008980928s1190 us b 000 0 eng d■0010000450219
■001PCUL00363944
■002ED378858
■00520020804024740
■007heuumu---buua
■008980928s1190 us b 000 0 eng d
■040 ▼apcul
■0410 ▼aEnglish
■090 ▼a370.78▼bE68
■24500▼aEvaluating Deficiencies in Campus Facilities: The Institutional ResearchPhysical Plant Nexus.▼cCasey, John M▼h[microform]
■260 ▼aU.S.; Georgia▼c11 Oct 90
■300 ▼a25; 1
■440 0▼aERIC Reports
■500 ▼a25p.; Paper presented at the Meeting of the Southern Association for Institutional Research and the Society for College and University Planning (Fort Lauderdale, FL, October 11, 1990). For a related paper, see HE 028 004.
■520 ▼aThe University of Georgia (UG) conducted a complete campus building condition evaluation survey in 1989 that identified the nature and magnitude of the capital renewaldeferred maintenance requirements for each campus building. The survey design was based on a model developed by Harlan Bareither at the University of Illinois. Data were collected at weekly meetings held for 3 hours each over several months. The dollar value of all necessary capital renewal and deferred maintenance work was estimated on a building by building basis. The total analysis covered 1,118 buildings comprising over 11 million square feet. The estimate for each building was compared to the total replacement value of the building and the resultant percentage deficiency was recorded. Results found that: (1) roof and window replacements totaled almost ▼19 million; (2) new fixed equipment and elevators totaled over ▼36 million; (3) plumbing and fire protection waste piping and sprinkler systems totaled over▼22 million; (4) replacement of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems equipment and controls accounted for almost ▼79 million; and (5) new distribution wiring and fire alarms were estimated at▼22 million. The analysis also noted that under a formula funding system like the one UG uses, the total deficiency of almost 30 percent cannot be corrected with the planned yearly funding level of .75 percent of total replacement cost. (Contains 43 references.) (JB)
■521 ▼aAdministrators; Pract
■533 ▼aMicrofiche.▼bSpringfield, VA▼cERIC Document Reproduction Service.▼emicrofiches ; 11×15 cm.
■650 4▼xEducation
■653 ▼aCapital▼aCapital Outlay (for Fixed Assets)▼aCollege Buildings▼aEducational Facilities▼aEducational Finance▼aFacility Case Studies▼aFacility Improvement▼aFacility Inventory▼aFacility Requirements▼aHigher Education▼aLife Cycle Costing▼aNeeds Assessment▼aState Colleges▼aBuilding Maintenance▼aFacilities Audits▼aFacility Evaluation▼aUniversity of Georgia
■7001 ▼aCasey, John M.
■999 ▼a143; 150
